These six reviews of land reclamations deal with sites that have been
drastically altered by industry and society, readily appearing scarred. The
previously intact ecosystems have been so completely removed that they would
likely require hundreds of years to rehabilitate. In some cases, no form of
vegetation will grow on these sites without drastic intervention. Within these
reclamation reviews the mining of coal, metals, peat, and stone are discussed,
as well as human waste water management and wetland mitigation. These issues
are worldwide and intrinsically tied to increased individual consumption rates
and population growth. The reviews bring to the forefront the impact people
make on the land, and the consequences of that impact. It is important to
understand both the motivation that prompts these land scarring activities as
well as the motivation that prompts the reclamation of these lands. These
insights will be crucial in gaining a deeper understanding of the problems
regarding land use and consumption of natural resources, and thus, the scope and
meaning of possible solutions.
 
Behind each of these six reviewed reclamation projects, there is a motivation
which effects its success in some way. Each reviewer touches on these
motivations. Michael Smith's review of a 3,600 acre reclamation in Ontario,
Canada depicts a historical aesthetic that concentrated on making things tidy
and green in an otherwise dead landscape. Stephanie Neid points out the
conflicting dual motivation in a Minnesota project where the biology of a
wetland mitigation and the engineering of a catchment pond run-off system are at
odds. Jason Bidwell addresses the motivation in an Alaskan strip mining site to
gain public support for a reclamation project. This motivation materialized in
denser plantings and larger seedlings being placed in areas of high visibility.
Mary Peterson discusses a quarry site project in Colorado where "little
interest was shown in chemical use to speed oxidation of the exposed rock face
solely for aesthetic reasons, even though the scar has visibility from several
points in the Boulder County area". Steve Roos sites motivation behind raised
bog reclamation to include their value as a biological and renewable consumable
resource. J. Mitch Allan presents a project in California where the human
impact on the site (wastewater) is used to sustain wildlife habitat, as well as
to provide recreation and education for the local community.
 
Each of these reclamation projects pursued a different level of insight into its
own meaning in relation to society and in relation to the original land
alteration, such as mining. Meaning is critical because reclamations have the
potential to effect people's attitudes and actions. Reclamations can be much
more than scientists cleaning up after industrialists and society in general.